Live classes v/s Recorded classes- Which is better


Well, in a significant way. Your question’s answer would have two sides, just like a coin. Assume you’re in one of the most outstanding classes available. The professor has an excessive amount of domain experience and knowledge. Does it literally make a difference, whether it is live classes or recorded? It accomplishes a sort of great deal, contrary to popular belief. Right? If it’s a live class, you’ll have plenty of opportunities to dig deeper into the subject/content being addressed. He or she will undoubtedly be able to respond to your questions in the most efficient manner possible, which mostly is fairly significant. You would not want to miss out on the opportunity for one-on-one connection in such a situation in a particularly big way.

It’s also very probable that you’ll want to listen to the class more frequently as time goes on, which for the most part is quite significant. As a result, the recording becomes more important, allowing you to focus more on the information given rather than taking notes and thereby multitasking, even if you are an expert at it. Imagine a boring speech where you can tell the speaker isn’t particularly knowledgeable about the domain/subject. Is this going to make a difference? You either want the meeting to end quickly or rather record it merely to have the “notes” for the presentation. 

It’s people to people in a live class: 

Based on the students’ understanding, queries, and needs, the teacher might adjust his or her presentation. It generally is what it means to kind of has a human touch. Every class contains many parts that the students are entirely ignorant of. A live person can undoubtedly maintain a pupil’s attention, something a recording cannot, which is fairly significant. As a “live” instructor, one finds it difficult to believe that technology can replace them. They essentially assume recorded courses have their place—for example, instructing pupils in rural locations, which is quite significant. 

However, in our opinion, nothing can replace a live instructor, and we can’t imagine pupils preferring a recording. Naturally, everyone has a lot of questions about their subject, and having a professional answer them in real-time is a fantastic experience. On the other hand, many find pre-recorded sessions overly impersonal literally. Some feel like they are listening to a speech, and there’s no way to learn about current events because the same old stuff has been available since the recording began. 

Active participation is essential as a student. Do not be swayed solely by financial considerations when making an efficient decision in a big way. The live class generally are more expensive, but they are superior. Better training also means a better likelihood of landing a decent job. If you can land a good job faster, basically your financial situation will almost certainly improve. Instead, pre-recorded class sessions may be less expensive than live online seminars, but they will eat up your time. Learning late sometimes means missing out on opportunities in a significant way. It is necessary to make investments in order to have a brighter future, so do not hesitate to attend the live training sessions. As a result, the decision is always yours, which is fairly significant. 


Studying abroad vs studying in India – Which one to go for?

Previous article

New Jersey estate planning: Wills vs. Trusts Explained

Next article